Roe v. Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort

124 F.3d 1221 (1997)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Roe v. Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
124 F.3d 1221 (1997)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Jane Roe (plaintiff) was an accounts manager for Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort, Inc. (Cheyenne) (defendant). Cheyenne implemented a mandatory drug and alcohol testing policy and gave employees, including Roe, copies of the policy. The policy prohibited employees from possessing, consuming, or being under the influence of alcohol, illegal drugs, controlled substances, or illegally obtained or improperly used prescription or over-the-counter medications during work hours or on company property. The policy further required employees to report all drugs present in their body and to be free of all drug use while on the job; prescribed drugs could be used only upon a supervisor’s approval. The policy also permitted random drug testing. Roe refused to consent to Cheyenne’s policy and filed suit in federal district court, arguing that the policy violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Cheyenne paused implementation of the policy until the court case had been resolved. The district court ruled that the policy constituted a disability-related inquiry and violated the ADA. Cheyenne appealed to the Tenth Circuit for review, and the court addressed Cheyenne’s arguments, including an argument that Roe did not have standing to bring her ADA claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holloway, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership