From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Roelandt ex rel. Roelandt v. Apfel
United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
125 F. Supp. 2d 1138 (2001)
William J. Roelandt’s father (plaintiff) filed for supplemental security income on Roelandt’s behalf, alleging that he was disabled due to severe attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Roelandt’s father provided school records documenting his increasingly disruptive and violent behavior and medical evidence showing that Roelandt was first prescribed medication to control his ADHD in 1994, the dosage was increased at least four times over four years, the brand was briefly substituted with no effectiveness, and Roelandt had a hard time keeping up with the schedule for taking it. Medical records further showed that Roelandt exhibited signs of depression, anxiety, and paranoia and that he had been hospitalized with suicidal and homicidal ideations. Roelandt’s school records showed that he had 24 disciplinary reports of incidents, in one school year, including disrupting class, threatening students and staff, fighting, sexual assault, and suspension. Roelandt’s application was denied initially, upon reconsideration, and following a hearing before an administrative-law judge (ALJ). The ALJ found that Roelandt suffered from severe impairments but that the impairments were not of the severity to meet nor medically or functionally equal the administration’s listing of ADHD. The ALJ’s decision became the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Kenneth Apfel (defendant). Roelandt filed a complaint in United States district court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Pratt, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.