Rogath v. Siebenmann

129 F.3d 261 (1997)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rogath v. Siebenmann

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
129 F.3d 261 (1997)

SC
Play video

Facts

Werner Siebenmann (defendant) sold a painting to David Rogath (plaintiff) for $570,000. Siebenmann warranted in the sale contract that the painting was an authentic self-portrait by Francis Bacon, and that he did not know of any challenges to the painting’s authenticity. However, Siebenmann claimed that he informed Rogath about a potential challenge to the authenticity from an art gallery in London before Siebenmann and Rogath entered into the sale contract. Subsequently, Rogath sold the painting to a third party, but the third party returned the painting after it discovered a challenge to the painting’s authenticity. Rogath accepted the returned painting and brought suit against Siebenmann for breach of warranty, among other things, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The district court granted Rogath’s motion for summary judgment on the breach of warranty claim. Siebenmann appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McLaughlin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership