Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
R

Rogers v. Tristar Products, Inc.

559 F. App’x 1042, 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1722 (2012)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rogers v. Tristar Products, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
559 F. App’x 1042, 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1722 (2012)

Facts

Paul Rogers (plaintiff) brought a complaint against Tristar Products, Inc. (Tristar) (defendant) on behalf of the United States government, alleging that Tristar had falsely marked a product as being patented. Rogers himself had suffered no injury from the alleged false marking—a ground on which Tristar moved for dismissal of the suit. The federal district court granted the motion. Rogers appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. After the appeal was initiated, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) was signed into law. The AIA made injury a requirement for standing in a false-marking case. This provision was intended to curb a proliferation of false-marking litigation. The provision was retroactively applied, without exception, to pending cases commenced before the AIA’s enactment. Rogers’s appeal was dismissed. Rogers then moved for reconsideration, alleging that the dismissal of his action constituted a violation of the takings and due-process clauses of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Patent

Key Terms