Rolfs v. Commissioner

668 F.3d 888 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rolfs v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
668 F.3d 888 (2012)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

The Rolfs (plaintiffs) purchased a three-acre property that had a house on it. The Rolfs wanted to build a new house, so they donated the old house to the local fire department for a training exercise. This saved the Rolfs an estimated $10,000 in demolition fees. The Rolfs claimed a $76,000 charitable deduction on their income-tax return for the value of the burned house, calculated as the difference between the value of the property before and after the old house was destroyed. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner) (defendant) and the United States Tax Court disallowed the deduction. The tax court found that the Rolfs had failed to show that the value they received from the donation—the fair market value of the house’s destruction—did not exceed the value of the donation itself. The Rolfs, the tax court continued, had incorrectly valued their donation because they failed to factor in the condition on which their gift was made—that the fire department would burn down the house and leave the property otherwise intact for the Rolfs to repurpose. The before-and-after method of valuation that the Rolfs had used was therefore inappropriate because the fire department would never enjoy the full use of the house. As there is no market for houses being sold to burn, the tax court instead proposed that the value of the donation be determined by analogy, considering the value of the house if it was used for salvage or moved off the land, and found that the house had negligible value. The Rolfs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership