From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...
Rollins v. Cone Distributing, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
710 Fed. Appx. 814 (2017)
Twanetta Rollins (plaintiff) worked for Cone Distributing, Inc. (defendant) as a probationary employee. Cone supervisors said Rollins was difficult and did not train well and terminated her employment after 45 days. Rollins sued, alleging gender discrimination and retaliation. In discovery, Rollins deposed eight Cone employees, including its administrative vice-president, who described Rollins’s difficulties and the decision to fire her. Cone also produced the personnel files of three male employees Rollins identified as possibly receiving better treatment than her. Rollins nonetheless sought additional discovery, including a second deposition of the vice-president, who Rollins claimed was unprepared to answer questions about her termination during his first deposition, and the personnel file of every employee who had ever held Rollins’s position. Rollins also asked Cone interrogatories about why she was fired and to provide related documents, including notes taken at a specific meeting, and any internal employment discrimination policies or procedures she could have used. Except for the meeting notes, the trial court denied Rollins’s requests, reasoning that they exceeded the needs of the case and duplicated discovery already provided. The trial court concluded that Rollins could not prove Cone’s explanations for her termination merely pretextual and granted Cone summary judgment. Rollins appealed, arguing the trial court should have compelled the additional discovery.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 550,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 550,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.