Roman Angonese v. Cassa Di Risparmio Di Bolzano SpA
European Union Court of Justice
Case C-281/98, 2000 E.C.R. I-4139 (2000)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
Roman Angonese (plaintiff) was a citizen of Italy from the Bolzano region of Italy, where the native language of many people, including Angonese, was German. Angonese moved to Austria for several years to study. While living in Austria, Angonese applied for a job with a bank in Bolzano, Cassa Di Risparmio Di Bolzano (the Bolzano bank) (defendant). The Bolzano bank required job applicants to take a test demonstrating that the applicant was fluent in German and Italian. However, the Bolzano bank only accepted the certification of an applicant’s language fluency based on a test administered by the province of Bolzano. The Bolzano language test was only offered several times per year and only in Bolzano. Angonese had not taken the language test but offered other evidence that he was bilingual in German and Italian. The Bolzano bank rejected Angonese’s application because he failed to take the Bolzano language test. Angonese sued the Bolzano bank, arguing that the bank’s requirement that applicants prove language fluency only through the Bolzano language test violated the freedom of movement for workers guaranteed under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.