Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco v. Sheffield
California Court of Appeal
93 Cal. Rptr. 338 (1971)
- Written by Max Milstein, JD
Facts
Sheffield (plaintiff) entered into a contract with the Canons Regular of St. Augustine (defendant), a Catholic monastic order, of Switzerland for the purchase of a trained St. Bernard dog. Sheffield made the first payments, but the Canons Regular did not send the dog, and would not give him a refund. Sheffield filed suit against the Canons regular, the Pope, the Vatican, and the Archbishop of San Francisco, his hometown. Sheffield contended that the Catholic Church and its local dioceses are alter egos of one another, with the Pope appointing local officials in San Francisco merely to manage the church’s affairs there, and that canon law held the church to be a hierarchy, with the pope at the top. The Archbishop replied that he was not a party to the contract to purchase a St. Bernard, and that the Archdiocese of San Francisco was a separate legal entity from the church, with its own assets and obligations. The Archbishop moved for the case against him to be dismissed, and the lower court denied that motion. The Archbishop appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (David, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.