Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA

991 N.E.2d 666 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA

New York Court of Appeals
991 N.E.2d 666 (2013)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

The mother of a girl who said she was molested by Reverend James Smith sued the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn (the Diocese) (plaintiff) for negligent hiring and supervision. The abuse allegedly occurred on multiple occasions over a six-year period in several church areas, Smith’s vehicle, and two homes. The Diocese settled the lawsuit for $2 million and demanded reimbursement from its insurers. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (National Union) (defendant) provided the Diocese primary coverage under consecutive one-year commercial general-liability policies the first three years the abuse occurred. (Another insurer not named in the lawsuit provided coverage the remaining years.) The National Union policies covered damages resulting in bodily injury during the policy period, with a liability limit of $750,000 and a self-insured retention (SIR) of $250,000 for each occurrence. The policy did not include a clause showing the parties intended to aggregate multiple incidents into a single occurrence. The parties agreed National Union was liable for damages over $250,000 for each occurrence within a policy year, capped at $750,000. The Diocese sued National Union seeking indemnity for the settlement. National Union argued that the incidents of abuse were separate occurrences, requiring the Diocese to pay the $250,000 SIR for each one before National Union had to cover the remainder. The Diocese countered that the abuse counted as a single occurrence, requiring only one SIR. The trial court found the abuse constituted a single occurrence. The appellate court reversed, finding it was multiple occurrences each requiring an SIR, but granted the Diocese leave to appeal to New York’s highest court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rivera, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Graffeo, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership