Romanchuk v. Plotkin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
9 N.W.2d 421 (1943)
- Written by Rocco Sainato, JD
Facts
Samuel Plotkin (defendant) purchased a corner lot in Minneapolis, on which sat a duplex. Both houses in the duplex were connected to the public sewer through a common sewer drain. In 1921, Plotkin acquired an adjoining plot, which also contained a residence. Shortly after purchasing this lot, he obtained a mortgage on it. One year later, Plotkin connected the new plot’s residence to the common sewer drain for the duplex. In 1936, Plotkin defaulted on the mortgage, which was foreclosed upon by Margaret Roggeman. She subsequently sold the lot to Nicholas Romanchuk (plaintiff). Several years later, the common sewer drain clogged, requiring extensive repairs. Plotkin then attempted to disconnect Romanchuk’s property from the common drain. Romanchuk then brought an action to enjoin Plotkin from doing so. The trial court determined that Romanchuk held an easement in the common sewer drain, and thus was entitled to its use. Plotkin petitioned for certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Peterson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
