Rondini v. Bunn

434 F. Supp. 3d 1266 (2020)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rondini v. Bunn

United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
434 F. Supp. 3d 1266 (2020)

Facts

Terry Bunn, Jr. (defendant) met Megan Rondini, a college student, for drinks, after which they went back to Bunn’s residence. Megan sent text messages to her friends indicating an intention to engage in sexual relations with Bunn and asking to be picked up in the morning. Bunn and Megan had sexual intercourse. However, Megan apparently became uncomfortable with the situation. Unable to exit through Bunn’s locked bedroom door while he slept, Megan jumped through a window. Megan reported that she had been raped, stating that she had verbally expressed a lack of desire to have sex. Bunn told his attorney that he had no memory of the encounter due to intoxication. Trauma associated with the incident contributed to Megan’s deteriorating mental state, withdrawal from university, and ultimate suicide. Megan’s parents, Michael and Cynthia Rondini (plaintiffs), brought a wrongful-death action against Bunn. The action included claims of wrongful imprisonment and assault and battery in connection with alleged sexual assault. Bunn moved for summary judgment, arguing that there was no evidence of assault or battery because Megan consented to have sex with him.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Proctor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership