Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Ronnen v. Ajax Electric Motor Corp.

New York Court of Appeals
648 N.Y.S.2d 422 (1996)


Facts

Neil Norry (plaintiff) was the chief executive officer of Ajax Electric Motor Corporation (Ajax) (defendant). Norry and his sister Deborah Ronnen owned a majority of Ajax’s issued and outstanding stock. In 1982, Norry, Norry’s two sons, and Ronnen entered into a shareholders’ agreement. The agreement granted Norry the right to vote Ronnen’s shares by proxy with respect to any and all matters relating to Ajax’s day-to-day operations and corporate management. Norry also had the right to vote Ronnen’s shares regarding any proposed sale of all or substantially all of Ajax’s assets. However, Ronnen retained the right to vote on other major corporate-policy decisions. Additionally, the parties agreed to vote the shares: (1) to ensure a seat on the board of directors for Ronnen, (2) to ensure Ronnen had continued access to all reports concerning Ajax’s management, and (3) to generally cap Norry’s total executive compensation at $125,000 a year. At a shareholders’ meeting on March 13, 1995, Ronnen served a temporary restraining order on Norry that prohibited Norry from voting the Ronnen shares to amend the bylaws or the certificate of incorporation. Norry adjourned the meeting, but Ronnen stayed behind with a few other shareholders and elected a new slate of directors. Norry filed a lawsuit to invalidate the election and sought an order directing a new election. The trial court granted Norry’s request for a new election. Ronnen appealed, and the New York Appellate Division affirmed. Ronnen then appealed to the New York Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Levine, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.