Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Rose on Behalf of Clancy v. Moody

629 N.E.2d 378 (N.Y. 1993)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...

Rose on Behalf of Clancy v. Moody

Court of Appeals of New York

629 N.E.2d 378 (N.Y. 1993)

Facts

A mother had three children. The mother had custody of two of the children. The children’s grandmother had custody of the third child, Robert. The mother was completely dependent on social services for financial aid. The Oswego County Department of Social Services (DSS) filed a petition to compel the mother to pay child support to the grandmother for Robert based on the New York statutory child-support guidelines that provided that a child-support award amount could be no less than $25 per month. The Federal Child Support Enforcement Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. § 667, required state child-support guidelines to create a rebuttable presumption that the child-support amount determined by the guidelines was the correct amount. The Act permitted this presumption to be rebutted by showing that the amount determined under the guidelines was unjust or inappropriate. The family court found that mother’s annual income was $0 and that the appropriate amount of child support was $0. The appellate court found that the Act preempted the New York law that established the $25 minimum for child support. DSS appealed, seeking to circumvent preemption by arguing that the $25 in child support would not be collected in practice in cases like this, but should nevertheless be awarded “to send a uniform public policy message.”

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bellacosa, J.)

Dissent (Levine, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership