Rosen v. United States
United States Supreme Court
245 U.S. 467 (1918)
Rosen (defendant), Wagner (defendant), and Broder were charged with conspiracy to receive stolen checks. Broder pleaded guilty and was called as a witness to testify against the defendants. The defendants objected to Broder’s testimony, arguing that Broder was not competent to be a witness because he had previously pleaded guilty to forgery in another case. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York permitted Broder to testify. The defendants were convicted. The defendants appealed, relying on the common-law rule that an individual convicted of forgery was incompetent to testify as a witness unless and until the individual was pardoned. The court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Clarke, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.