From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Rosenberg v. Smidt
Supreme Court of Alaska
727 P.2d 778 (1986)
In 1973, Alvin and Janice Smidt (plaintiffs) purchased property in Alaska from Rodney Spendlove and William Johnson. The property was encumbered by a deed of trust executed by Spendlove and Johnson. The Smidts executed a second deed of trust in favor of Spendlove and Johnson for $6,200, the balance of the purchase price. Alaska Title Guaranty Company (Alaska Title) was named as trustee on both deeds of trust. In 1980, Spendlove and Johnson defaulted on the note secured by the first deed of trust, and Alaska Title began nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings. As required by statute, Alaska Title mailed notice of default to the Smidts, as assignees of Spendlove and Johnson, at the Smidts’ last known address, i.e., the address on the deed of trust executed seven years earlier. However, the mail was returned as unclaimed. Alaska Title also published notice of the deed of trust sale in a newspaper. Despite Alaska Title’s efforts, the Smidts never received actual notice of the sale. Fred and Rita Rosenberg (defendants) purchased the property at public foreclosure under a deed of foreclosure stating that notice had been given in compliance with the law. The Smidts continued making payments to Spendlove and Johnson under the deed of trust until 1981, when the Smidts learned of the sale to the Rosenbergs. The Smidts sued to set aside the sale. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to the Smidts, divesting the Rosenbergs of title to the property. The court also ruled that Alaska Title, as trustee, had a duty to take reasonable steps to discover the current address of record interest holders, like the Smidts, before selling the property. The Rosenbergs appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Compton, J.)
Dissent (Moore, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.