Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Rosenfeld v. Basquiat

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
78 F.3d 84 (1996)


Facts

Michelle Rosenfeld (plaintiff) was an art dealer who allegedly contracted with Jean-Michel Basquiat, an artist, to purchase three of his paintings. Six years after Rosenfeld and Jean-Michel allegedly entered into the contract, Jean-Michel died. Because the contract had never been fulfilled, Rosenfeld sued the administrator of Jean-Michel’s estate, Gerard Basquiat (defendant), for damages or specific performance. At trial, Rosenfeld testified that she went to Jean-Michel’s apartment on October 25, 1982, where Jean-Michel agreed to sell her three paintings for $4,000 each. Rosenfeld gave Jean-Michel a $1,000 cash deposit, and he used crayon to write out a “contract” identifying the paintings, stating “$12,000 – $1000 DEPOSIT – OCT 25 82,” which was signed by Rosenfeld and Jean-Michel. Rosenfeld presented this “contract” at trial. Rosenfeld stated that several days later, Jean-Michel told Rosenfeld that he wanted to exhibit the paintings for a few years prior to delivery. The jury could not reach a verdict. The district court declared a mistrial, and the case was reassigned. In the second trial, Rosenfeld did not testify as to her interactions with Jean-Michel, and Rosenfeld’s attorney introduced, without any objection from Gerard, portions of Rosenfeld’s testimony from the first trial. The jury found in favor of Rosenfeld, and the district court entered judgment for Rosenfeld. Gerard appealed, arguing that the judge should not have admitted Rosenfeld’s prior testimony and that the statute of frauds barred Rosenfeld’s claim.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Cardamone, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.