Rosenfeld v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp.
Court of Appeals of New York
309 N.Y. 168 (1955)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
In a policy-related proxy contest (as opposed to a personal contest for power) for a board of directors election in Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp. (Fairchild) (defendant), Fairchild’s treasury paid $106,000 in defense of the old board of director’s position; $28,000 to the old board by the new board after the change to compensate the old board for their failed campaign; and $127,000 reimbursing expenses that the new board members incurred in their campaign. That reimbursement was ratified by a majority vote of the stockholders. The policy question behind the proxy contest was the long-term and very expensive pension contract of a former director, Carlton Ward. Rosenfeld (plaintiff), brought suit to compel the return of the above payments to the Fairchild treasury. The lower court dismissed Rosenfeld’s complaint. He appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Froessel, J.)
Dissent (Van Voorhis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
