Rosenman v. United States
United States Supreme Court
323 U.S. 658 (1945)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Louis Rosenman died on December 25, 1933. By law, any amounts determined to be owed as estate taxes were due within one year of Rosenman’s death. On December 24, 1934, the executors of Rosenman’s estate (plaintiffs) remitted $120,000 to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Neither the IRS nor the executors had arrived at a calculation of the amount of estate tax owed at that time. Accordingly, the executors’ purpose in making the remittance was not to satisfy a determined estate-tax liability but rather to avoid the running of any interest or penalties for late payment of estate taxes pending the determination of the amount of those taxes. On February 25, 1935, Rosenman’s estate filed an estate-tax return, having determined that the estate ultimately owed approximately $80,000 in taxes. The IRS had not yet completed its audit of the estate’s return and thus had not arrived at its own assessment of the estate’s ultimate tax liability. Accordingly, the IRS told the executors that it had credited $80,000 of the estate’s December 1934 remittance in satisfaction of any assessed taxes, leaving a balance of $40,000. In April 1938, the IRS completed its audit, determining the estate’s overall tax liability to be approximately $130,000, and assessed a deficiency of $50,000. The IRS claimed the balance of the December 1934 remittance, and the executors paid the IRS an additional $10,000 to satisfy the remainder of the deficiency. In May 1940, the executors determined that the estate was entitled to additional tax deductions and filed a refund claim with the IRS for approximately $25,000. The IRS, citing the fact that any refund claim for overpayment of taxes had to be made within three years of the tax payment, rejected the estate’s claim except as it pertained to the $10,000 April 1938 payment. The estate sued the United States government (defendant) for the full refund in the Court of Claims, which held in favor of the government. The estate appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Frankfurter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.