Rosenthal v. Rosenthal
Maine Supreme Judicial Court
543 A.2d 348 (1988)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Theodore Rosenthal (plaintiff) and Robert and Rona Rosenthal (defendants) were involved in numerous family businesses that, in essence, comprised a complex family partnership. Theodore sued Robert and Rona, alleging that they wrongfully froze him out of the family businesses in violation of their fiduciary duties. Regarding the duty of good faith, the trial court instructed the jury that the members of the business enterprises were obligated to discharge their duties in good faith with a view toward furthering one another’s interests as to matters within the scope of their relationship. The jury found that Robert and Rona violated their fiduciary obligations to Theodore. Robert and Rona appealed, arguing that the judge should have limited the jury instructions to the scope of the parties’ fiduciary duties to furthering the interests of the business enterprise rather than furthering the interests of one another.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McKusick, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.