From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Rosenthal v. Warren
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
475 F.2d 438 (1973)
Dr. Martin C. Rosenthal, a New York resident, died after a surgery performed by Dr. Warren (defendant) at New England Baptist Hospital (hospital) (defendant), a Massachusetts corporation. Dr. Warren was a world-renowned surgeon who treated patients from around the world. Approximately one-third of the hospital’s patients were from outside of Massachusetts, and in the year of Dr. Rosenthal’s death, 9 percent of the hospital’s patients were New York residents. The hospital also solicited and received donations worldwide. Mrs. Rosenthal (plaintiff), a New York resident, filed a malpractice claim in New York state court against Dr. Warren and the hospital for malpractice, and she requested $1.25 million in damages. The lawsuit was removed to federal district court. Dr. Warren and the hospital argued that Massachusetts law should be applied to Mrs. Rosenthal’s claim. Massachusetts law imposed both minimum and maximum damages limits in wrongful-death cases and assessed damages in proportion to the tortfeasor’s culpability. The maximum allowable recovery was $50,000. The district court held that New York law, which allowed unlimited damages, applied. The court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Mrs. Rosenthal on this issue, and Dr. Warren and the hospital appealed. In support of their appeal, Dr. Warren and the hospital argued that Massachusetts law should apply because both the surgery and the death occurred in Massachusetts and because the parties intended for Massachusetts law to apply in the event of a malpractice claim.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Oakes, J.)
Dissent (Lumbard, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.