Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Rosetta Stone LTD v. Google, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
676 F.3d 144 (2012)


Facts

Rosetta Stone LTD (Rosetta Stone) (plaintiff) sold language-learning software. Google, Inc. (Google) (defendant) offered advertising though sponsored links. To advertise though a sponsored link, an advertiser purchased a keyword. When a Google user searched the purchased keyword, a link to the advertiser’s website would come up in the search results. Initially, Google prohibited advertisers from purchasing third-party trademarks as keywords if the trademark owner objected. In 2004, Google changed its policy to allow advertisers to purchase trademarks as keywords even if the trademark owner objected. Internal studies by Google indicated that including third-party trademarks in the advertising or link text would confuse consumers. Google disallowed unauthorized trademark use in text until 2009, when Google changed its policy. Subsequently, Rosetta Stone complained to Google that owners of sponsored links using Rosetta Stone’s trademarks as keywords and in text were marketing counterfeit Rosetta Stone products. Rosetta Stone reported 190 instances of sponsored links’ owners’ selling counterfeit Rosetta Stone products, but Google allowed the owners of those links to continue using Rosetta Stone’s trademarks in other sponsored links. Rosetta Stone sued Google, asserting various trademark claims, including direct infringement, dilution, and contributory infringement. Rosetta Stone presented anecdotal evidence from consumers who purchased counterfeit software after clicking on a sponsored link. Rosetta Stone also presented an expert report concluding that 17 percent of consumers demonstrated actual confusion. The district court granted all of Google’s dispositive motions, and Rosetta Stone appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Traxler, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.