Ross v. Bumstead
Arizona Supreme Court
173 P.2d 765 (1946)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Bumstead (plaintiff) agreed to sell an orchard with all of its buildings, rights, and personal property to Ross (defendant). Under the contract, Ross gave Bumstead $5,000 upon signing the contract, would give Bumstead $20,000 upon delivery of the title and the deed, and then was to pay the remaining cost in installments over the next six years. The contract specified that upon delivery of the title and deed, Ross’s ownership of the orchard was to relate back to the date of the contract for adjusting for costs and income from the property. Unfortunately, the orchard-packing plant and warehouse were destroyed by fire eight days after the contract was signed and before the title and deed were delivered. Ross requested that Bumstead make an adjustment to the sale price for the loss, but Bumstead refused. Ross then stopped payment on his $5,000 check and refused to complete the contract. Bumstead sued Ross to recover the difference between their contract price and the actual price of selling the orchard to another party. The lower court entered a judgment for Bumstead, and Ross appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Farley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.