Ross v. Creighton University
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
740 F.Supp. 1319 (1990)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Kevin Ross (plaintiff) was a talented high school basketball player recruited by Creighton University (defendant) to play on its college team. However, Ross scored exceptionally low on the ACT standardized examination and his academic skills were well below par. Ross alleges that Creighton knew he was not prepared to handle college-level courses, but allowed him to enroll in “bonehead” courses such as ceramics, marksmanship, and sports-related classes in order for Ross to maintain his eligibility to play basketball. After four years, Ross’ basketball eligibility expired and he had earned only 96 of the 128 credits required to graduate, had maintained a “D” average, possessed the reading skills of a seventh grader, and had overall language skills of a fourth grader. Thereafter, Creighton representatives obtained remedial education for Ross at a school designed for elementary and high school-aged students. Ross filed suit against Creighton in contract and tort, alleging that the university had an obligation to educate him.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nordberg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.