Ross v. Creighton University

740 F.Supp. 1319 (1990)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ross v. Creighton University

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
740 F.Supp. 1319 (1990)

Facts

Kevin Ross (plaintiff) was a talented high school basketball player recruited by Creighton University (defendant) to play on its college team. However, Ross scored exceptionally low on the ACT standardized examination and his academic skills were well below par. Ross alleges that Creighton knew he was not prepared to handle college-level courses, but allowed him to enroll in “bonehead” courses such as ceramics, marksmanship, and sports-related classes in order for Ross to maintain his eligibility to play basketball. After four years, Ross’ basketball eligibility expired and he had earned only 96 of the 128 credits required to graduate, had maintained a “D” average, possessed the reading skills of a seventh grader, and had overall language skills of a fourth grader. Thereafter, Creighton representatives obtained remedial education for Ross at a school designed for elementary and high school-aged students. Ross filed suit against Creighton in contract and tort, alleging that the university had an obligation to educate him.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nordberg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership