Ross v. Figueroa
California Court of Appeal
139 Cal. App. 4th 856, 43 Cal. Rptr. 3d 289 (2006)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Tameka Ross (plaintiff) was in a relationship with Oscar Figueroa (defendant) and lived with him for a significant period of time. Ross petitioned the trial court for an ex parte temporary restraining order (TRO) against Figueroa. The trial court granted the TRO and issued an order on a standard court form. Ross served the order granting the TRO and setting the date of the hearing on whether to make the restraining order permanent. A section of the order advised Figueroa that if he wanted to respond in writing to the order, he had to have the response served on Ross prior to the hearing. Figueroa did not serve a written response prior to the hearing, and both Ross and Figueroa appeared for the hearing pro per, which means without attorneys. At the beginning of the hearing, Figueroa requested a continuance, which the trial court denied. The trial court also denied Figueroa’s request to submit evidence. The trial court granted the permanent restraining order for the maximum period of three years. Figueroa appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.