Rosser v. Prem
Maryland Court of Special Appeals
449 A.2d 461, 52 Md. App. 367 (1982)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Eleanor B. Wasserman’s daughter, Linda, died at the age of eight from cancer. Wasserman later wrote a book, entitled Linda, about Wasserman’s experiences following Linda’s death, including spiritual experiences and Wasserman’s conversion from Judaism to Christianity. Wasserman’s will established a trust to expand and revise the book as necessary and to distribute the book for the benefit of other parents who had experienced the death of a child. The trust property included the book’s manuscript and the bulk of Wasserman’s estate. Following Wasserman’s death, the personal representative of Wasserman’s estate, Robert C. Prem (plaintiff), filed an action seeking a declaratory judgment on whether the trust was valid. The trustee, Thomas E. Rosser (defendant), answered that the trust was valid. At a hearing, two experts testified, including a professor of English and an author’s representative. Both testified that Linda was without literary merit and was not marketable. Following the hearing, the master concluded that Linda was without merit and did not set forth any doctrine or promote any interest of the community. Accordingly, the master concluded that the trust did not have a charitable purpose and was invalid as a charitable trust, and because the trust did not have ascertainable beneficiaries, it failed as a private trust. Rosser appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Moore, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.