From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Rossignol v. Voorhaar
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
316 F.3d 516 (2003)
Facts
Kenneth Rossignol and Island Publishing Company (collectively, Rossignol) (plaintiffs) distributed St. Mary’s Today, a county newspaper that often strongly criticized public officials, including Sheriff Richard Voorhaar and his department. Several deputies who expected that the election-day coverage in St. Mary’s Today would be critical of Voorhaar and other candidates supported by the sheriff’s office organized a plan to form teams and purchase every available copy of St. Mary’s Today in the county. The deputies admitted that the goal was to anger Rossignol and protest his irresponsible reporting. The election-day issue of St. Mary’s Today included critical commentary about various candidates. The night before the election, off-duty sheriff’s deputies in plain clothes drove their personal cars across the county to buy out the newspaper. The deputies paid for and lawfully obtained the newspapers. Rossignol sued Voorhaar in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Rossignol asserted that the deputies violated the First Amendment by suppressing the distribution of St. Mary’s Today in retaliation for its criticism of Voorhaar. The district court found that Voorhaar and his deputies did not act under the color of law, granted summary judgment on the federal claim, and dismissed the state claims without prejudice. Rossignol appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wilkinson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
