Roulo v. Russ Berrie & Co.

886 F.2d 931 (1989)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Roulo v. Russ Berrie & Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
886 F.2d 931 (1989)

Facts

Georgia Lee Miller Roulo (plaintiff) owned a copyright and trade-dress rights greeting-card line called Feeling Sensitive (FS). The FS cards were beige, single-sided, no-fold, brown-inked cards that used Roulo’s handwriting and sentimental verses with frequent ellipses. The FS card writing appeared between vertical borders that each featured four stripes: one brown and one colored stripe between two silver foil stripes. From about April 1978 to April 1980, the FS cards were sold under a distribution agreement between Roulo and Russ Berrie & Company, Inc. (Berrie) (defendant). In late 1979, Roulo notified Berrie that Roulo did not intend to renew the agreement. Berrie then began developing its own greeting-card line, Touching You (TY). Like the FS cards, the TY cards had similar sentimental verses; were priced identically, i.e., 80 cents; and were single-sided brown-inked cards with messages in cursive. However, the background of the TY cards was cream instead of beige. The TY cards also used border stripes, but only two colored stripes on the left side and a single colored stripe on the right side, and no foil strips. However, the TY cards depicted a foil butterfly upon the two left-hand stripes. Both the FS and the TY cards were displayed in four-sided, freestanding, rotating racks holding 32 cards. Berrie sold its TY cards through the same retailers that sold the FS cards during the parties’ distribution agreement. Roulo obtained copyright registrations for both the FS cards and a rack display header featuring her likeness. Roulo sued Berrie in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, asserting claims for trade-dress infringement and copyright infringement. The parties tried the action to a jury, which rendered a verdict for Roulo on both claims, awarding $4.3 million in damages. Berrie appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cummings, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership