Rousku v. Commissioner

56 T.C. 548 (1971)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rousku v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
56 T.C. 548 (1971)

AR

Facts

George Rousku (plaintiff) was a United States citizen who operated an automobile-body-repair shop in Canada. Rousku owned the building the shop was in, and the shop contained tools and inventory. The tax commissioner (defendant) sent Rousku a notice of tax deficiency. Specifically, the notice stated that, under the § 911 tax exclusion in the Bankruptcy Code, which allows taxpayers to exclude certain foreign income when determining United States taxes, only 30 percent of Rousku’s income from the business could be excluded because both personal services and capital were material income-producing factors. Rousku sued, arguing that fixing cars was primarily a personal service and capital was not a material income-producing part of the business. Under § 911, capital was not a material income-producing factor if the gross income of the enterprise consisted mainly of fees or other compensation for personal services. Capital was a material income-producing factor if the operation of the business required substantial inventories or substantial investments in plants or other equipment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Featherstone, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership