Rovell v. American National Bank

232 B.R. 381 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rovell v. American National Bank

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
232 B.R. 381 (1998)

SC

Facts

Michael Rovell (debtor) wrote a check (check 1) to an agency but later determined that he had overpaid. Rovell’s employee Lisa Fair called Rovell’s bank, American National Bank (ANB) (creditor). Although there was contradictory evidence about the information exchanged on this phone call regarding the identification of check 1 and whether it had cleared, Fair ultimately issued a stop-payment order on check 1. ANB advised Fair to wait a couple of days before issuing a replacement check. ANB’s technology programmed a stop-payment order to be effective at the opening of business the following day. Due to this technology, check 1 cleared before the stop-payment order could be processed. Nevertheless, Rovell, believing that check 1 had not cleared, issued a replacement check (check 2). Rovell filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. ANB filed a proof of claim for the amount of the two checks. Rovell objected to the claim and claimed that ANB was guilty of negligent misrepresentation due to its failure to precisely convey the status of check 1. The bankruptcy court denied the objection, allowed ANB’s claim, and held that Rovell had not shown that ANB was guilty of negligent misrepresentation. Rovell appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moran, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership