Rowland v. Christian
Supreme Court of California
443 P.2d 561 (Cal. 1968)
Nancy Christian (defendant) invited James Rowland (plaintiff) to her home. While using Christian’s bathroom, Rowland severely injured his hand when one of the sink fixtures broke off and cut him. Christian became aware of a crack in the fixture two weeks earlier, and had asked her landlord to fix it. Christian failed to warn Rowland of the dangerous condition. Rowland brought suit against Christian. At trial, the evidence did not show that the defect was obvious or open, or that Rowland had any reason to know of its existence. The trial court granted summary judgment for Christian on the ground that Rowland was a social guest, and that he was barred from recovery due to doctrines of assumption of risk and contributory negligence. Rowland appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Peters, J.)
Dissent (Burke, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.