Roxana Arguedas Rojas v. The State
Costa Rica Supreme Court
Res. No. 342, Exped. No. 99-000072-0163-CA (2005)

- Written by Whitney Waldenberg, JD
Facts
Thirteen-year-old Roxana Arguedas Rojas (plaintiff) was raped repeatedly by the principal of her school in 1992. Roxana became pregnant and gave birth to a daughter, Joselyn Arguedas Rojas. Due to Roxana’s pregnancy, she was forced to leave school and her family had to move to another town due to ridicule by the close-knit community. At that time, the statute of limitations on a civil claim was three years. However, the statute of limitations was tolled while the principal was criminally prosecuted. The criminal judgment became effective on October 6, 1996. A few months before the criminal case concluded, the legislature passed a law extending the statute of limitations to four years for actions commenced after July 29, 1996, irrespective of when the underlying conduct giving rise to the suit took place. On October 5, 1998, Roxana filed a claim against the Education Ministry (defendant) on her own behalf, as well as on behalf of her daughter, seeking damages for moral harm suffered by both of them. Roxana also sought pecuniary damages for support of her daughter through the age of 25. The government argued that Roxana’s daughter was not entitled to moral damages because she was not a victim. The trial court dismissed Roxana’s case on the ground that the statute of limitations had run on her claims, and it did not address the merits of her claims. The appellate court affirmed, and Roxana appealed to the Costa Rica Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Solís Zelaya, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

