Rubert-Torres v. Hospital San Pablo, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
205 F.3d 472 (2000)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
On July 14, 1996, Josefina Rubert-Torres (plaintiff) filed a medical-malpractice suit against Hospital San Pablo, Inc. (hospital) and Dr. Néstor Rivera-Cotté (defendants). The complaint alleged that Rivera-Cotté’s malpractice caused Rubert-Torres’s daughter to suffer cerebral palsy. After the hospital answered the complaint, discovery commenced. On November 26, 1996, the parties met for the first scheduling conference. On April 30, 1997, the parties met for a second scheduling conference. During the meeting, the hospital requested that Rubert-Torres support the medical-malpractice allegations with specific facts. After Rubert-Torres failed to do so, the hospital motioned for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 12(c). One week after the hospital’s motion, Rubert-Torres filed an opposition to the FRCP 12(c) motion and included an expert-witness report with the motion. The district court then converted the hospital’s motion for judgment on the pleadings into a motion for summary judgment and granted the motion. Rubert-Torres appealed, claiming that the district court improperly converted the FRCP 12(c) motion into a summary judgment motion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wallace, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.