Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club

463 U.S. 680 (1983)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club

United States Supreme Court
463 U.S. 680 (1983)

Facts

Following announcements by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of standards regarding the maximum permissible emissions of sulfur dioxide from coal-burning power plants, the Sierra Club and the Environment Defense Fund (EDF) (plaintiffs) challenged the standards by filing petitions in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. After the court of appeals rejected all claims, the Sierra Club and the EDF filed requests for attorney’s fees. The Sierra Club and the EDF based their requests on the language of the Clean Air Act, which allowed a court to award attorney’s fees if the court “determines the award is appropriate.” The Sierra Club and EDF took the position that this language allowed for an award of attorney’s fees regardless of their success in the case because they were furthering the goals of the Clean Air Act by bringing their action to challenge the EPA’s standards. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)

Dissent (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership