Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club
United States Supreme Court
463 U.S. 680 (1983)

- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
Following announcements by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of standards regarding the maximum permissible emissions of sulfur dioxide from coal-burning power plants, the Sierra Club and the Environment Defense Fund (EDF) (plaintiffs) challenged the standards by filing petitions in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. After the court of appeals rejected all claims, the Sierra Club and the EDF filed requests for attorney’s fees. The Sierra Club and the EDF based their requests on the language of the Clean Air Act, which allowed a court to award attorney’s fees if the court “determines the award is appropriate.” The Sierra Club and EDF took the position that this language allowed for an award of attorney’s fees regardless of their success in the case because they were furthering the goals of the Clean Air Act by bringing their action to challenge the EPA’s standards. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.