From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Rucker v. Schmidt
Minnesota Supreme Court
794 N.W.2d 114 (2011)
Katherine Rucker (plaintiff) and Robert Rucker entered proceedings for the dissolution of their marriage. Katherine and Robert agreed to use an independent appraiser to determine the value of Robert’s 50 percent interest in a tile shop. They signed a marriage-termination agreement whose property-settlement award to Katherine was based on the appraiser’s valuation of Robert’s interest in the store. Their marriage was legally dissolved. Later, Katherine brought suit against Robert for fraud on the court, asserting he intentionally provided incorrect information to the appraiser to obtain an undervalued result. The district court found in Katherine’s favor and awarded her an additional sum. Robert appealed, but the claim was settled before the appeal was final. Katherine then brought suit against Steven Schmidt (defendant), the attorney who had represented Robert in the dissolution action, and Rider Bennett, LLP (defendant), the law firm that employed Schmidt. The district court found that Robert had a relationship of privity with Schmidt and Rider Bennett, invoking res judicata and barring Katherine’s claim. The district court granted summary judgment to Schmidt and Rider Bennett. Katherine appealed. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that an attorney-client-relationship does not constitute privity as a matter of law and that further inquiry was required as to the potential for an injustice against Katherine if res judicata were to be applied. Schmidt and Rider Bennet appealed. The Minnesota Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Page, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.