Ruiz v. Hull

191 Ariz. 441, 957 P.2d 984 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ruiz v. Hull

Arizona Supreme Court
191 Ariz. 441, 957 P.2d 984 (1998)

Facts

In 1998 Arizona added an amendment to its state constitution requiring that the state and its political subdivisions must “act in English and in no other language.” The amendment extended standing to sue to enforce the amendment to anyone living in or doing business in Arizona. The amendment provided a few limited exceptions, such as permitting the teaching of a foreign language. The effort to pass this amendment was driven by Arizonans for Official English (AOE). In pamphlets supporting the amendment, AOE’s chairman stated that the purpose of the amendment was to mandate that government functions be carried out in English, with few exceptions. The chairman stated that allowing people to speak in multiple languages caused division. Another group, the Legislative Council, stated that a society with multiple languages created tension and ethnic distrust. Armando Ruiz and a group of bilingual elected officials and government employees (plaintiffs) alleged that the amendment violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and sued the governor of Arizona (defendant) for declaratory judgment. The trial court ruled that the amendment was a content-neutral regulation of speech and did not violate the First Amendment. Furthermore, the trial court ruled that the amendment did not violate equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment, because Ruiz did not establish that Arizona’s English-only amendment was motivated by discriminatory intent. The Arizona Supreme Court reviewed the case. The attorney general argued a narrower interpretation of the amendment before the state’s highest court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moeller, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership