Rumbin v. Utica Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
757 A.2d 526 (2000)
- Written by Joseph Bowman, JD
Facts
Rumbin (plaintiff) signed a structured settlement agreement with Utica Mutual Insurance Co. (Utica) (defendant) to settle a claim for personal injury. The contract provided for a lump sum and additional payments over fifteen years. Safeco Life Insurance Company (Safeco) (defendant) funded the annuity, and the annuity contract included an antiassignment provision that stated “[n]o payment under this annuity contract may be…assigned…in any manner by the [plaintiff].” Later, Rumbin suffered financial difficulties. Rumbin sought a declaratory judgment from the trial court that would allow him to sell his rights under the settlement agreement to J.G. Wentworth. The trial court ruled in Rumbin’s favor. Safeco appealed to the Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Vertefeuille, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.