Rummel v. Estelle, Corrections Director
United States Supreme Court
445 U.S. 263, 100 S.Ct. 1133, 63 L.Ed.2d 382 (1980)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Between 1964 and 1973, William James Rummel (defendant) was convicted three times for nonviolent property felonies, the total value of which was about $230. Pursuant to the Texas recidivism statute, which was harsher than almost any other state's, Rummel's third felony conviction subjected him to life imprisonment as a recidivist. Rummel brought a habeas corpus action against Estelle, the Texas director of corrections. Rummel did not question the state's right to treat his crimes as felonies, but he contended that his life sentence was so disproportionate to the nonviolent crimes he committed that it violated the Eighth Amendment. The district court denied relief. Rummel appealed and a circuit court panel reversed. The full circuit court reheard the case en banc and reinstated the district court's judgment. The full court placed particular importance on Rummel's eligibility for parole after 12 years. Rummel appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
Dissent (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
