Runyon v. Kubota Tractor Corp.

653 N.W.2d 582 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Runyon v. Kubota Tractor Corp.

Iowa Supreme Court
653 N.W.2d 582 (2002)

Facts

Jake Runyon (plaintiff) was a regional sales manager for Kubota Tractor Corporation (Kubota) (defendant), a California corporation. When Runyon was hired in 1977, he lived in Iowa. A few years later, Runyon moved to Missouri but retained responsibility for several Kubota dealerships in Iowa. Runyon visited the Iowa dealerships regularly, maintained telephone contact with the Iowa dealers, and attended trade shows in Iowa. Runyon’s compensation included salary, commissions, and a discretionary bonus. Approximately 70 percent of Runyon’s commissions were attributable to sales in Missouri, with the remainder resulting from sales to dealers in Nebraska and Iowa. Runyon filed his income tax returns in Missouri. In accordance with the terms of Kubota’s discretionary-bonus program, Kubota deducted $3,979 from Runyon’s 1999 bonus for the cost of inventory that Runyon’s dealerships in Missouri and Iowa sold but did not pay Kubota for. The deduction amounted to a 15 percent reduction in the bonus that Runyon otherwise would have received. Runyon sued Kubota, arguing that the deduction violated the Iowa Wage Payment Collection Law (wage statute) and that Kubota should pay liquidated damages under the wage statute for intentionally failing to pay wages that Runyon was owed. The trial court found, as a matter of law, that the wage statute applied to the dispute but that Runyon was not entitled to liquidated damages. The jury returned a verdict for Runyon on the wage claim. Kubota appealed, and Runyon cross-appealed on the question of the availability of liquidated damages.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Neuman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership