Rushink v. Gerstheimer

82 A.D.2d 944 (1981)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rushink v. Gerstheimer

New York State Supreme Court
82 A.D.2d 944 (1981)

  • Written by Lauren Petersen, JD

Facts

Mary Gerstheimer (defendant) drove to the Middletown Psychiatric Center. Gerstheimer parked her car in front of a pharmacy that was located on Middletown Psychiatric’s grounds. Gerstheimer left the keys in the ignition and the car unattended. A Middletown Psychiatric resident patient, Stephen Rushink, drove away in Gerstheimer’s car. Rushink drove off the road, hit a tree, and died. Section 1210(a) of New York’s Vehicle and Traffic law prohibited a person from leaving a vehicle unattended without removing or hiding the vehicle’s key. Rushink’s estate (plaintiff) sued Gerstheimer for negligence, alleging that because she violated § 1210(a), Gerstheimer was negligent per se. Rushink’s estate moved for summary judgment. Gerstheimer also moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied both parties’ motions to dismiss. Rushink’s estate and Gerstheimer appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mahoney, J.)

Concurrence (Mahoney, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership