Russ v. Watts

414 F.3d 783 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Russ v. Watts

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
414 F.3d 783 (2005)

Facts

Robert Russ was driving home from college to his mother’s home around 1:00 a.m. A police officer attempted to pull over Russ, but Russ did not stop the car. A police chase ensued involving multiple officers (the officers) (defendants). The chase ended when Russ collided with police vehicles. The officers surrounded Russ with their weapons drawn. One officer broke a car window and fired, killing Russ. Russ’s baby, through the baby’s mother, filed a state tort action against the officer, which resulted in a multimillion-dollar verdict. Russ’s parents (the parents) (plaintiffs) attempted to be involved as parties in that lawsuit, but their efforts failed. The parents then filed a second, federal lawsuit against the officers for, among other things, violating their constitutional right to associate with their son. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the officers, reasoning that the parents did not have standing to bring the claim. The parents appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flaum, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership