Russell v. Yale University

737 A.2d 941 (1999)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Russell v. Yale University

Connecticut Appellate Court
737 A.2d 941 (1999)

Facts

John Sterling created a charitable trust to benefit his alma mater, Yale University (Yale) (defendant). The trust’s funds were to be used for the construction of buildings memorializing Sterling’s gratitude to Yale. In 1930, the trustees voted to give Yale money for the construction and maintenance of Yale’s divinity-school quadrangle. Over time, various other alumni donors (plaintiffs) also made charitable contributions to the divinity school. In 1996, Yale approved plans to reorganize the divinity school. The plans included demolishing large portions of the quadrangle. Sterling’s heir, Cynthia Sterling, along with the alumni donors and certain students then enrolled in the divinity school (collectively, plaintiffs) filed suit against Yale, seeking an injunction preventing execution of the reorganization plan, a declaration that the plan constituted an abuse of the discretion related to a public charitable trust, and an accounting of all gifts and donations that Yale received for the divinity school’s benefit. Yale moved to dismiss the suit, arguing that the various plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the action. The trial court agreed and dismissed the action. Cynthia, the alumni donors, and the students appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lavery, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership