Rutherford v. Commissioner

T.C. Memo. 1978-505

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rutherford v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo. 1978-505

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Bennie Rutherford (plaintiff) was a farmer who raised cattle. Rutherford entered into an agreement with Wardlow. Wardlow would give 12 half-blood cows to Rutherford, and in exchange, Rutherford would breed the cows with a registered bull and give Wardlow the first 12 three-quarter-blood cows. Wardlow delivered the 12 half-blood cows to Rutherford, and Rutherford delivered the 12 three-quarter-blood cows to Wardlow over the course of three years. Rutherford deducted the cost of producing the cows as expenses on his income-tax returns for those three years and argued that his basis was the fair market value of the half-blood cows. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner) (defendant) argued that Rutherford had no basis in the half-blood cows because they were paid for through the exchange of property under § 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. Rutherford petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tannenwald, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership