Ryan v. Buckeye Partners, L.P.

2022 WL 389827 (2022)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ryan v. Buckeye Partners, L.P.

Delaware Court of Chancery
2022 WL 389827 (2022)

Facts

Buckeye Partners, L.P. (Buckeye) (defendant) was a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership. Buckeye’s relationship with its limited partners, known as unitholders, was governed by a limited-partnership agreement (LPA). The LPA stated that Buckeye’s unitholders did not have a right to receive distributions. Instead, distributions were at the sole discretion of Buckeye’s general partner, namely, Buckeye’s parent company. The LPA also disclaimed any fiduciary duties owed by Buckeye’s general partner and replaced them with a contractual standard of good faith, defining good faith as a belief that an action was in Buckeye’s best interests. In 2019, Buckeye negotiated a merger with IFM Investors Pty Ltd. (IFM). IFM agreed to purchase Buckeye’s outstanding public units at a 27.5 percent premium over their trading value. To secure that premium, Buckeye agreed to a provision in the merger agreement that prohibited Buckeye from making distributions to unitholders between the agreement’s execution and the transaction’s closing. On July 31, 2019, Buckeye’s unitholders approved the merger transaction, and the transaction closed as planned on November 1, 2019. Walter Ryan (plaintiff) filed a putative class-action suit on behalf of himself and certain other unitholders against Buckeye, its general partner, and the general partner’s board of directors (the Buckeye parties) (defendants). He alleged that they breached their fiduciary duties to unitholders and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by timing the merger so that unitholders did not receive a customary fall distribution. He argued that avoiding the distribution unfairly transferred additional value to IFM at the unitholder’s expense. The Buckeye parties moved to dismiss Ryan’s claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Slights, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership