Ryan v. State

988 P.2d 46 (1999)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ryan v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court
988 P.2d 46 (1999)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Roy Ryan (defendant) was married to Keri Ryan. Their marriage was turbulent, and domestic violence was prevalent, as witnessed by numerous friends, neighbors, and coworkers. Ryan routinely kicked and punched Keri, isolated and controlled her, and demanded to know where she was. Keri’s coworkers noted that Ryan called Keri incessantly at work, 10 times or more during a shift, to check on her. Ryan emotionally abused Keri through constant criticism. Ryan was also excessively jealous, often accusing her of having extramarital affairs. In early November 1996, the couple separated. Keri obtained a restraining order against Ryan but later had it dismissed. Thereafter, Keri began dating someone else. Ryan became depressed and lost noticeable weight. One evening, Ryan shot Keri with a gun and then shot himself. Ryan called 911 as he was bleeding out in the home where Keri was dying or already dead. The state (plaintiff) charged Ryan with murder. At trial, numerous witnesses testified to Ryan’s abusive conduct, which he admitted. The state also introduced the testimony of an expert witness, Rosemary Bratton, who had worked with both battered and battering spouses. Bratton not only testified about battered-woman syndrome to explain Keri’s conduct, but also testified about the characteristics and common behaviors of an abusive spouse. For example, Bratton described batterers’ tactics to control and isolate, threats to commit suicide, and tendency toward pathological jealousy, including incessant calls and accusations. Bratton further testified to increased violence during a couple’s separation period due to the abuser’s growing anger and anxiety and that abusers were more likely to commit acts of violence with guns during the period. The jury convicted Ryan, and he appealed, arguing that Bratton’s testimony was erroneously admitted as character evidence against him.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kalokathis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership