Rylands v. Fletcher
House of Lords
[1868] L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
Fletcher (plaintiff) operated several underground coal mines on land adjacent to land on which Rylands (defendant) had built a reservoir for the purpose of supplying water to his mill. Rylands employed engineers and contractors to build the reservoir. In the course of building the reservoir, these employees learned that it was being built on top of abandoned underground coal mines. This fact was unknown by Rylands. After the reservoir was completed, it broke and flooded Fletcher’s coal mines. This caused damage to Fletcher’s property, and Fletcher brought suit against Rylands. The Court of Exchequer held that Rylands was not liable, and the decision was appealed to the Court of Exchequer Chamber. There, Rylands was held strictly liable for damage caused to Fletcher’s property by water from the broken reservoir. Rylands appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cairns, L.C.)
Concurrence (Cranworth, L.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.