S.R. Bommai v. Union of India
India Supreme Court
(1994) 2 S.C.R. 644 (1994)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
Under Article 356 of the Indian Constitution, the prime minister and cabinet may request the president of India impose presidential rule over the Indian states. If presidential rule is invoked, the state government is dismissed in favor of the governor of the state, a politician appointed by the president of India. Between 1988 and 1994, the president of India dismissed the state governments from the states of Karnataka, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Himachai Pradesh. In all six states, the president of India dismissed the state government when an opposition party controlled the state government. In 1994, four consolidated cases arising from these six states came before the Indian Supreme Court challenging the power of the president of India to impose presidential rule.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pandian, J.)
Concurrence (Sawant, J.)
Concurrence (Ahmadi, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.