SAFARI and the NRA v. United States (ZINKE) [Department of Interior]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
878 F.3d 316 (2017)
- Written by Jack Newell, JD
Facts
The United States was a signatory of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, a treaty that lists endangered species and regulates their trade. Congress passed the Endangered Species Act (ESA), which banned the importation of most threatened and endangered species. The ESA empowered the Department of the Interior (defendant) to make rules to enhance the preservation of endangered species. The Department of the Interior released findings that the Zimbabwean elephant population may have declined and issued a rule that Zimbabwean elephant trophies could not be imported into the United States. The Safari Club and the National Rifle Association (NRA) (plaintiffs) sued in federal district court, claiming that the rule was arbitrary and capricious because the Department of the Interior had not gone through the notice-and-comment period. The Department of the Interior claimed that the rule was actually an adjudication, and the district court agreed. The Safari Club and the NRA appealed the case to the District of Columbia Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Edwards, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.