Safe Extensions, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration

509 F.3d 593 (2007)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Safe Extensions, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
509 F.3d 593 (2007)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD
Play video

Facts

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (defendant) issued a series of advisory circulars regarding the testing requirements of airport-runway light bases. There are two types of light bases—adjustable and fixed. The FAA required both types of light bases to pass a so-called torque test. Through one of its advisory circulars, the FAA changed the requirements related to light bases and no longer required fixed light bases to pass the torque test. In a later advisory circular, the FAA imposed more stringent testing requirements on adjustable light bases. The FAA solicited comments for a subsequent advisory circular related to the new testing requirements from several companies that made adjustable light bases. Safe Extensions, Inc. (plaintiff) manufactured adjustable light bases, but it was not one of the companies from which the FAA sought comment. The companies that did provide comments argued that the test was unfair because it targeted only adjustable light bases even though neither adjustable nor fixed light bases could pass the new torque test. The companies also claimed that there had never been a safety issue with adjustable light bases in 20 years of use. The FAA issued the advisory circular with the new testing requirements, providing only a brief explanation for its decision and stating that the variability inherent in installation of adjustable light bases necessitated closer attention with respect to anti-rotational features. Safe Extensions filed for review of the latest advisory circular in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, claiming that the FAA had acted arbitrarily and capriciously by singling out adjustable light bases.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tatel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership