Safford Unified School District #1 v. Redding
United States Supreme Court
557 U.S. 364, 129 S. Ct. 2633, 174 L. Ed. 2d 354 (2009)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Middle-school vice principal Kerry Wilson (defendant) discovered that students in the school were giving out prescription-strength ibuprofen and over-the-counter naproxen. These pills were common pain relievers. One student told Wilson that she had received the pills from 13-year-old Savanna Redding (plaintiff). Wilson confronted Redding, and Redding denied having any knowledge of the pills. Wilson searched Redding’s backpack and did not find any more pills. Wilson then had a female administrative assistant (defendant) take Redding into the office of the female school nurse (defendant) to perform a strip search. Redding was directed to undress down to her underwear and then pull her bra and underwear away from her body and shake them. This exposed her breasts and pelvic area to the two school employees. Redding described this as embarrassing, frightening, and humiliating. No pills were discovered. Redding sued the school district (defendant), Wilson, the administrative assistant, and the school nurse (collectively, the school parties) for violating her Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable government searches. The district court granted the school parties’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the claim. Redding appealed the decision. In an en banc decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s decision, finding that the search of Redding violated her Fourth Amendment rights but that only the school district and Wilson could be liable for the violation. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.