Safford Unified School District #1 v. Redding
United States Supreme Court
129 S.Ct 2633 (2009)
In October 2003, the assistant principal of the middle school that Redding (plaintiff) was attending confronted Redding with certain items supposedly belonging to her. Some of the items were painkillers, which were generally banned under school rules without advance permission. Redding denied any knowledge of the pills. The principal told Redding that he had heard she was distributing the drugs to classmates. She denied this and allowed a search of her belongings, which revealed no proscribed items. The principal then asked a female administrative helper to take Redding to the school nurse’s office to search her clothes. The helper and the nurse asked Redding to remove her jacket, socks, and shoes. Finding nothing, they then asked her to remove her stretch pants and T-shirt. Still finding nothing, they told her to remove her bra and to shake it, as well as to pull out the elastic on her underwear. When Redding did so, she exposed her breasts and pelvic area. No contraband items were found. Redding’s mother filed suit against the school and the officials, claiming that they conducted an illegal strip search under the Fourth Amendment. The officials moved for summary judgment, raising the defense of qualified immunity. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that the search violated Redding’s rights and denied the officials’ defense of qualified immunity. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)
Dissent (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.