Appeals Court of Massachusetts
781 N.E.2d 54 (2003)
Sejal Sagar and Mahendra Sagar entered into an arranged marriage in India after a brief acquaintance. They moved to the United States and had a daughter in 1998. Six months after her birth, the couple separated. Mr. Sagar was very controlling and had physically and mentally abused Mrs. Sagar. The divorce court awarded the Sagars joint legal custody of their daughter, whom the couple agreed to raise in accordance with their Hindu religion. A disagreement arose over whether the daughter should undergo a ritual known as Chudakarana. The ritual required shaving the girl’s head, applying a mark to it, and bestowing blessings. It was to be done before her third birthday but could be delayed if the father atoned. Mr. Sagar desired that the daughter undergo the ritual, which was intended to promote good health. Mrs. Sagar did not want the ritual performed. She questioned its necessity as neither she nor other family members had participated in it. She also questioned her husband’s sincerity given that he never asked before their marriage whether she had undergone the ritual. Mr. Sagar argued before the trial court that his right to demand that the ceremony be performed was protected by his constitutional right to free exercise of religion. The trial court ordered that the parents’ decision regarding the Chudakarana be delayed until the child was old enough to decide for herself. The court also appeared to find that the father’s right to free exercise was not implicated in the matter because his insistence on the Chudakarana was based on his desire for control rather than a sincerely held belief. An appeal was taken.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Grasso, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.